Remove review-prompt and migrate the only unique BW instruction to the CLAUDE.md (#18049)

.claude/CLAUDE.md

@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@
 
 - **NEVER** commit secrets, credentials, or sensitive information.
 
+- **CRITICAL**: Tailwind CSS classes MUST use the `tw-` prefix (e.g., `tw-flex`, `tw-p-4`).
+  - Missing prefix breaks styling completely.
+
 - **NEVER** log decrypted data, encryption keys, or PII
   - No vault data in error messages or console logs
 

.claude/prompts/review-code.md

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
-# Bitwarden Clients Repo Code Review - Careful Consideration Required
-
-## Think Twice Before Recommending
-
-Angular has multiple valid patterns. Before suggesting changes:
-
-- **Consider the context** - Is this code part of an active modernization effort?
-- **Check for established patterns** - Look for similar implementations in the codebase
-- **Avoid premature optimization** - Don't suggest refactoring stable, working code without clear benefit
-- **Respect incremental progress** - Teams may be modernizing gradually with feature flags
-
-## Angular Modernization - Handle with Care
-
-**Control Flow Syntax (@if, @for, @switch):**
-
-- When you see legacy structural directives (*ngIf, *ngFor), consider whether modernization is in scope
-- Do not mandate changes to stable code unless part of the PR's objective
-- If suggesting modernization, acknowledge it's optional unless required by PR goals
-
-**Standalone Components:**
-
-- New components should be standalone whenever feasible, but do not flag existing NgModule components as issues
-- Legacy patterns exist for valid reasons - consider modernization effort vs benefit
-
-**Typed Forms:**
-
-- Recommend typed forms for NEW form code
-- Don't suggest rewriting working untyped forms unless they're being modified
-
-## Tailwind CSS - Critical Pattern
-
-**tw- prefix is mandatory** - This is non-negotiable and should be flagged as ❌ major finding:
-
-- Missing tw- prefix breaks styling completely
-- Check ALL Tailwind classes in modified files
-
-## Rust SDK Adoption - Tread Carefully
-
-When reviewing cipher operations:
-
-- Look for breaking changes in the TypeScript → Rust boundary
-- Verify error handling matches established patterns
-- Don't suggest alternative SDK patterns without strong justification
-
-## Component Library First
-
-Before suggesting custom implementations:
-
-- Check if Bitwarden's component library already provides the functionality
-- Prefer existing components over custom Tailwind styling
-- Don't add UI complexity that the component library already solves
-
-## When in Doubt
-
-- **Ask questions** (💭) rather than making definitive recommendations
-- **Flag for human review** (⚠️) if you're uncertain
-- **Acknowledge alternatives** exist when suggesting improvements